📖 Part of the Capgemini Investigation Series — 10 articles examining Capgemini Australia's operations, employee treatment, and business practices.
The Dossier · Deep Dive · The Exodus · Survivor Stories · Financial Analysis · vs Competition · The Vulture · Invisible Workforce · AI Gamble · Series Home
The Arithmetic of Disappearing People
Every large IT consultancy offshores. That's not news. What makes Capgemini's approach notable is the scale, the speed, and the systematic nature of the hollowing-out.
Since 2021, Capgemini has added 134,500 employees to its global headcount. Of those, 134,400 are offshore. The onshore number is essentially unchanged.
Read that again. The company grew by 134,500 people and virtually none of them were in Australia, Europe, or the Americas.
This article examines how Capgemini's offshoring machine works, what it means for Australian workers and clients, and why the WNS acquisition changed everything.
For the financial mechanics behind offshoring, see our Capgemini Financial Deep Dive. For the human cost, see our Survivor Stories.
The Numbers: A Headcount Analysis
Global Headcount Over Time
| Period | Total | Onshore | Offshore | Offshore % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2025 | 342,700 | 143,300 | 199,400 | 58% |
| Q3 2025 | 354,700 | 142,900 | 211,800 | 60% |
| Dec 2025 (post-WNS) | 423,400 | 143,200 | 277,800 | 66% |
Sources: Capgemini Q1 2025 Revenues, Q3 2025 Revenues, FY 2025 Results
What the Trend Shows
Between Q1 2025 and December 2025:
- Total headcount: +80,700 (+24%)
- Onshore headcount: -100 (virtually unchanged)
- Offshore headcount: +78,400 (+39%)
Every single net new employee added by Capgemini in 2025 was offshore. Not most of them. Not the majority. All of them.
The WNS Acquisition: Offshoring on Steroids
In October 2025, Capgemini completed its acquisition of WNS Holdings for US$3.3 billion [Source: Capgemini Press Release, October 2025]. WNS is a NYSE-listed business process outsourcing company with its primary operations in India.
The deal added approximately 66,000 employees to Capgemini's headcount. Almost all of them are offshore.
This wasn't a strategic acquisition for AI capability or market access. It was a capacity play — buying a massive offshore workforce at a discount to build out Capgemini's "intelligent operations" offering.
The messaging was telling: Capgemini described the deal as creating "a global leader in agentic AI-powered intelligent operations" [Source: Capgemini Press Release]. In plain language: a global leader in replacing expensive Western workers with cheaper Indian ones, now with an AI branding veneer.
How the Machine Works
The Three-Phase Offshoring Playbook
Capgemini's offshoring follows a consistent pattern across Australian engagements:
Phase 1: Acquisition (Months 0-6)
When Capgemini acquires an Australian company (Empired, RXP, Acclimation, The Works), the initial promise is stability. Existing staff keep their jobs. The brand continues. Leadership remains in place.
During this phase, Capgemini's Indian operations begin familiarising themselves with the acquired company's systems, processes, and client relationships.
Phase 2: Integration (Months 6-18)
New reporting lines appear. Capgemini management overlays the existing structure. "Knowledge transfer" sessions begin — Indian teams shadow Australian counterparts, learning the work.
During this phase, some onshore roles are eliminated. The justification is "efficiency" or "restructuring." The reality is that the knowledge has been transferred, and the expensive Australian staff are no longer needed.
Phase 3: Offshore Delivery (Months 18-36)
By this phase, the acquired company's work is being delivered primarily from India. Australian staff are either gone or reduced to a thin layer of client-facing roles. The brand is retired. The "integration" is complete.
This is the Empired timeline. This is the RXP timeline. This is the Works timeline. And this will likely be the KPMG defence arm timeline — if the acquisition proceeds.
The BOQ Case Study
Bank of Queensland's experience with Capgemini's offshoring machine is well-documented:
- September 2025: BOQ announces "strategic partnership" with Capgemini for "agentic AI, IT, and business processing services" [Source: SMH, September 2025]
- Reality: 200 Australian jobs cut, including 165 contact centre roles — more than half the Australian workforce in that division [Source: BankingDay, September 2025]
- The replacement: Offshore delivery from a Capgemini-run centre in India
- The fallout: Customer service quality declined, with ProductReview.com.au reviews citing "offshore call centres with no ability to support customers" [Source: ProductReview.com.au]
The FSU's national secretary called it a betrayal. But from Capgemini's perspective, it was the business model working exactly as designed.
The Australian Impact
What Offshoring Means for Australian IT Workers
Salary suppression: When 66% of your workforce is offshore at a fraction of Australian rates, the downward pressure on onshore salaries is structural, not cyclical. Capgemini's average salary of A$113,561 [Source: PayScale] is 11-18% below the Australian IT market median of A$128,000-138,000 [Source: Ravio benchmarks].
The bench: Staff between projects are placed on "the bench" — internal, unbilled, and at risk. The bench exists because Capgemini maintains a pool of onshore staff for client-facing work while delivering the bulk offshore. Too long on the bench and "they will quickly find a way to get rid of you" [Source: Glassdoor review].
Career stagnation: When the work moves offshore, career progression slows. There are fewer projects, fewer promotions, and more competition for the remaining onshore roles. Multiple Glassdoor reviewers describe "opaque promotion processes" and "zero transparency around appraisals" [Source: Glassdoor].
Acquisition trauma: If you're acquired by Capgemini, the offshoring playbook begins immediately. The Empired, RXP, and Works experiences all followed the same pattern: initial stability, gradual integration, brand erasure, and workforce reduction.
What Offshoring Means for Clients
The bid-to-delivery gap: Capgemini consistently proposes senior, specialised staff during the bid phase. Once the contract is signed, these staff are replaced with junior or offshore resources. "Decisions are driven entirely by top-level reports that ignore the actual operational challenges on the ground" [Source: SEEK review].
Quality decline: The ME Bank experience illustrates the client impact. When Capgemini offshored half the contact centre team, customers experienced "hours-long wait times" [Source: FSU statement]. The new app rollout was marred by customers being locked out of their money for hours.
Security risk: The Razer data breach (2020) — where a Capgemini employee misconfigured a security setting, exposing 100,000 customers' data — shows the operational risk of offshore delivery. Capgemini was ordered to pay US$6.5 million in damages [Source: CNA, December 2022].
The Revenue Per Employee Trick
Capgemini Australia generates A$878 million in revenue from 2,989 employees — approximately A$294,000 per employee [Source: IBISWorld]. This figure is often cited as evidence of efficiency.
But it's a trick. Here's why:
When 60-66% of your global workforce is offshore at Indian salary rates (A$15,000-30,000 per year versus A$100,000-150,000 in Australia), the revenue-per-employee metric is artificially inflated. You're counting the revenue generated by the full workforce but dividing by a headcount that includes thousands of offshore staff earning a fraction of Australian rates.
The real metric is revenue per onshore employee — and that tells a different story. With approximately 900-1,200 onshore staff (estimated from the 2,989 total minus offshore operations), the revenue per onshore employee is closer to A$730,000-975,000. That's the number that reveals how much value Capgemini extracts from each remaining Australian worker.
The €700 Million Restructuring Question
In February 2026, Capgemini announced €700 million in restructuring costs over 2026-2027 [Source: Capgemini FY 2025 Results]. The company described this as "country-specific workforce and skills adaptation initiatives."
Translation: more redundancies in Australia and other Western markets. More offshoring. More cost reduction.
Combined with the WNS acquisition (which added 66,000 offshore staff), the restructuring signals Capgemini's direction: the company is becoming a predominantly offshore delivery operation with a thin layer of Western client-facing staff.
For Australian workers, this means: - The onshore headcount is unlikely to grow - Redundancies will continue - Salaries will remain below market - The bench will remain a source of anxiety
How Capgemini Compares
| Metric | Capgemini | Accenture | TCS | Datacom | NTT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore % (global) | 66% | ~50% | ~95% | ~20% | ~70% |
| AU Revenue/Employee | A$294K | ~A$250K | ~A$300K | A$260K | A$677K |
| Salary vs Market | -11-18% | Market | -15-25% | Market | -10-15% |
| Glassdoor AU | 4.0/5 | 3.8-4.0/5 | 3.4/5 | 3.1/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Acquisition Style | Aggressive buyer | Selective | Organic | Organic | Selective |
NTT's A$677K revenue per employee suggests the most aggressive offshoring model. Capgemini is catching up fast.
Red Flags for Clients
If you're considering hiring Capgemini, here's what to verify:
-
Named resources. Request named individuals in the contract, with retention guarantees. The team proposed at bid stage rarely matches the team that delivers.
-
Offshore ratios. Specify maximum offshore percentages contractually. Capgemini's default is to maximise offshore delivery.
-
Delivery oversight. Insist on onshore project management and delivery leadership. Offshore project management adds communication overhead and reduces accountability.
-
Exit clauses. Build exit clauses tied to delivery milestones, offshore ratio violations, and key personnel changes.
-
Security. Verify that offshore staff hold appropriate clearances for your data. The Razer breach is a cautionary tale.
Conclusion
Capgemini's offshoring machine is not hidden. The numbers are in their own quarterly disclosures. The pattern is documented in employee reviews across Glassdoor, Indeed, and SEEK. The client impact is visible in BOQ, ME Bank, and icare.
What makes Capgemini's approach notable is the scale: 66% offshore and climbing, with every net new hire being an offshore worker. The €700 million restructuring budget signals that this trend will accelerate, not reverse.
For Australian IT professionals, Capgemini is a place to learn specific skills — particularly in Microsoft, Azure, and cloud technologies — but it is not a place to build a long-term career. The structural incentives are misaligned: Capgemini profits from the gap between what it charges clients for "local" expertise and what it pays for offshore delivery.
For clients, the cheapest bid is never the cheapest outcome. And when Capgemini offers a price that seems too good to be true, ask yourself: who's actually doing the work?
This article is based on publicly available sources including Capgemini's own quarterly revenue disclosures, IBISWorld data, Glassdoor reviews (491 Australian reviews), TheLayoff.com posts, and media reporting from SMH, BankingDay, CNA, and iTNews. All factual claims are sourced.
Sources
Capgemini Headcount Data: - Q1 2025 Revenues — Onshore 143,300 (-1.4%), offshore 199,400 (+3.9%) - Q3 2025 Revenues — Total 354,700, offshore 60% - FY 2025 Results — Total 423,400, offshore 66%
WNS Acquisition: - Capgemini Completes Acquisition of WNS — October 2025 - Venture Intelligence — US$3.3B Deal — US$76.50 per share
BOQ Offshoring: - SMH — Hundreds of BOQ Jobs Lost — September 2025 - BankingDay — BOQ Cuts 200 Jobs — September 2025
Employee Reviews: - Glassdoor — Capgemini Australia — 4.0/5, 491 reviews - PayScale — Capgemini Australia — A$113,561 average - TheLayoff.com — No Pay Rise 2026 — February 2026
Security: - CNA — Razer v Capgemini — US$6.5M damages, December 2022
Financial Analysis: - IBISWorld — Capgemini Australia — A$878M revenue, 2,989 employees - Fortune India — €700M Restructuring — February 2026
Was this helpful?